Name: Vibhu Gangal
A significant reason for the recent fall in rupee is attributed to
macroeconomic deficiencies of India. The article below analyses the same and
tries to establish a relation between the steep fall of rupee and the general
tendencies, trends and situations prevailing in India that affect the economy
eventually.
The demand equation states that the aggregate demand (and the
national income at equilibrium) is an algebraic sum of consumption demand,
investment demand, government expenditure and net exports. The moment we say
'demand', it is backed by money and indicates a destination where people roll
out the money they possess. If this money is spent to fulfill any of these
demands which add up to the national income, it’s a positive sign. The more
this happens, the more the country grows economically, the more is the national
income, the stronger is the home currency. One scenario, where possession of
money with individuals of a nation can harm the economy, is when the money
possessed gets expended big time towards imports, which makes net exports and
overall national income negative, leaving the investment demand of the nation
unquenchable. A similar thing seems to have happened in India. Let’s take a
closer look at its causes and implications.
Consider an analogy, where we have a dam constructed with an aim to
irrigate fields. It has some water collected in the reservoir. This water flows
to the fields through channels. Thus, it’s the channels which ensure that the
water in the dam gets utilized for growing crops and not for domestic purposes
of farmers' households. Had the channels being broken and had the water been
routed to households instead of fields, crops could never have grown due to
lack of water and the production of the territory could have taken a severe
hit. The water is equivalent to liquid rupee with the Indians, crops to the
GDP, and channels to the government regulations and policies. In India, a major
part of money (water) is spent in buying volumes of gold by families (household
demand). If gold was available in India, the tendency of buying gold would have
created better circulation of money and the multiplier effect would have done well
to the economy. Unfortunately, out of 902 tones of domestic annual gold demand,
India produces only two tones and the rest 900 tones is imported.
More the demand for gold, more are its imports, more is the payment
in dollars, more is the influx of rupee in forex market, more is the outflow of
dollars from forex market, more depreciates the rupee, more expensive becomes any imported item
including gold. This self-feeding spiral continues and raises
ringing-alarm-bells when it reaches a stage where RBI cannot save the rupee by
adhoc workarounds like selling dollars and "trying" (rather
struggling) to induce more FII participation.
Directly, gold contributes 0.36% to inflation index. Indirectly, it
makes all imports including crude oil costlier fuelling input costs for all
industries ranging from plastics to automobiles. If the input costs rise, so
have to be the prices of finished products. Eventually it’s the inflation which
kicks off. The time lags between rise in gold demand, rise in import prices and
rise in end product prices make the three events appear disconnected to the
general public and as the "safest" option, we end up blaming the
government without any knowledge of ground level proceedings. Arithmetically,
every dollar reduction in international oil prices translates into a cut in
product price by 33 paisa.But every time the rupee depreciates against the US
dollar by one rupee,it translates into a requirement to raise prices by 77 paisa.
Another aspect is, with booming inflation, with industrial products
being costlier than earlier, why would a buyer in international market prefer
buying Indian expensive goods when the same is available at a lower price in
other countries? Together, with imports already being discouraged due to sharp
depreciation of rupee, this fall in exports due to inflation exacerbates the
trade deficit causing further decline in rupee value. It all gets again into
the self-feeding loop discussed above.
So, where do we break this infinite-loop of events where every step,
every action has a well justified reason behind it? But somewhere, somehow you
need to break this to get things in place. Weakeningor breaking one block might
give a temporary relief to figures, but in long run, this would cease growth.
Instead, if every link in the chain is made to melt down in terms of its
prominence, its just a matter of time, the whole chain shall cease to be
prominent. What I wish to convey is instead of unplanned adhoc and short-term
steps like giving subsidies on fuel prices and making efforts to attract hot
money sources, this nation needs to plan for a durable strategy which would 'subtly'
and 'indirectly' bring about relatively stiff and lasting changes in the
economy. Here’s what I mean to say…
Whenever individuals hold disposable rupee, government should ensure
that substantial part of rupee gets either invested into banks, corporate bonds,
government securities and the share market or it gets to quench 'domestic'
consumption demand of goods and services. Let’s remember in a dam, it’s the
channels which ensure the usage of water in desired way and ultimately govern
the production. Whenever it’sexpected to have an enhanced liquidity among
individuals, it should be THE time for government to make capital investment
attractive. This would trigger the multiplier to take effect and eventually
translate liquidity into growth. As far as demand for gold is concerned, it can
be discouraged by raising customs duty exorbitantly. Buying gold should be made
at least half as tough as buying a scooter was in late 1980s... Even if the
demand for gold reduces partially, this would mellow down dollar appreciation
and prevent further damage.
On the other hand, the consumer which demands gold and oil so
excessively needs to understand that if he chooses deliberately to intensify
imports, he is fuelling inflation to such an extent that he himself is going to
get in trouble. A major reason for S&P indicating to downgrade India in
terms of its investment-grade rating was a drought of investment opportunities
in India. With Indian businesses borrowing big-time from foreign sources, with other
events increasing imports and causing rupee to depreciate, Indian borrowers
will now pay more for every dollar borrowed. With every firm borrowing millions
of dollars, the rupee loss is going to be phenomenally huge and shall reflect
on a cost-cutting approach by companies' management which shall also include a
cut in salaries. Eventually, a self-check on surge of gold demand can help
prevent a number of significant things.
Recently, after a lot of hue and cry on oil price hike, the
government declared a subsidy on petrol price. I say why? As a long term plan,
the government should let the petrol price rise so that vehicular usage takes a
hit, even though the hit is marginal. Towns, where bikes and cars are favorites
for personal transport, should be picked up and transformed into towns with a
quality mass public transport, quality in terms of speed, frequency,
availability, ambience, approachability, grievance handling mechanisms and any
and every aspect which makes mass transport well-preferred and equal in status
vis-a-vis individual vehicles. This shall help in fading the rise in demand for
crude oil and so shall prevent the rest of the spiral.
One may say that it’s the gold which facilitates loans and so
fosters investment. But one misses to note that at the time of repaying the
same loan taken against gold, the value of the money repaid plummets so much
that the good done by the investment gets offset substantially by severe
inflation, the root cause for the good and the bad being the same. One may say
that if investment in India is on a backseat, why doesn't the government
invest? But one misses to note that it would be dumb on the government's front
to do so, as it is already burdened under a budget deficit of 5.19 percent and
any further disbursement of money would widen it more. One may say that
subsidies on fuel shall be continued for some more years as the inflation is
cost-pushed and not demand-driven. But one misses to note that it’s the demand
which drives the entire spiral discussed above and it’s the drive of this
demand which ultimately coverts into a cost-push inflation. Thus, it’s high
time now that the administration of the nation gets into a patient and
consistent mission of correcting the fundamentals of economy at a macro-level
with an aim to bring about a long-term change.
0 comments:
Post a Comment